Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Wow that sucked...

i decided to try and correlate specific supervisory techniques and psychological techniques used in conjunction with experimental pro-social theories within a specialty drug court. I then tried to link how those practices equaled the success of the participant.  I judged success by how many passed those particular portions of the process, which ultimately led to graduating the program.
 I found plenty of drug court articles in the journal of offender rehabilitation, however i didn't really find that "one awesome study" that would basically write my paper for me ;p. I'M NOT SAYING I WOULD PLAGIARIZE, PATCH WRITE, or any other conniving thing... i just didn't find that one source that "laid it all out there" for me and gave me every hint and lead i would need to track down more sources. (i.e. not having to comb through 100's of lit reviews and studies which is booooring). Anyways, good luck to you and your misery, if you happen to be reading this, this paper genuinely sucked to write ... mostly because I waited until Sunday night and Monday night to write it before it was due Tuesday night. < DON'T DO THAT!!!! Unless you have two jobs like me :) Whatever, with that being said get to know your lit review mini-papers and remember how to decipher what's useful and what isn't ... when you do get on par with filtering the b.s. most of these scholars include in their research, your horribly dreadful lit review will actually almost write itself.

No comments:

Post a Comment